Friday, 22 March 2013

Should the tax payers pay for a public health system, or should we all take responsibility for our own health care?

I asked two questions in my first blog, should the tax payers pay for a public health system, or should we all take responsibility for our own health care? And, how does the payment of health care affect the ability of lower income families to access health care?

I will be looking at my first question in this blog, while also looking at the history of the Public Health Care System in New Zealand  to see how we got to where we are today.
I will be looking at the second question in my next blog.

So, should health care be paid for by the tax payers or should each individual take responsibility for their own health care costs? 

But first, what is public health, in New Zealand? Te Ara, the encyclopedia of New Zealand defines public health as “health services that are funded by government through taxation” (Pollock,2012, para. 4).  


 Timeline of the Public Health System we currently have in New Zealand
  • 1872 the Public Health Act was established to set up health care in each province, 
  • 1876 health care was centralised, while local health boards were maintained,
  • 1903 the Department of Health was formed,
  •  1907 Plunket is formed by Dr Truby King,
  • 1926 introduction of immunisations for children,
  •  1935 hospitals visits became free,
  •  1938 the Labour government introduces a “dualsystem” of health care, private and public health care systems working alongside each other,
  • 1941 prescriptions are free,
  • 1974 ACC is formed, a fund to provide for accident cover, rehabilitation costs and loss of income cover, the beginnings of a privately funded medical system,
  • 1980’s sees the introduction of the neo-liberal free market economy model, effecting the health system, health care providers need to compete in the free market economy,
  • 1990’s sees  reforms ensuring that the health department is financially efficient and individualised health services,
  • 2000’s public health becomes the priority, eg, smoke free policies, immunisation policies and Public Health Committee is formed. 
(An Encyclopaedia of New Zealand, 1966;  New Zealand Government, n.d.; Plunket, n.d.; Southern Cross Healthcare Group, n.d.; Wikipedia, n.d.).
This timeline is just a small snippet of the complete and complex picture.  The information I have on the timeline are facts and dates I feel are important to show how New Zealand got the current Public Health System, and the formation of the partnership between public and private health care. 

The current New Zealand health care system is primarily paid for by the tax payers.  The government has a Ministry of Health that takes care of providing health care for all New Zealanders. The day to day running of the health system is done by District Health Boards (DHB).  According to Bramhall (2003) NZ was one of the first countries to have a universal health care system (para. 1).  

However, New Zealanders can choose to pay for their own health care through private health insurance.  In May 2012, 30% of New Zealanders had private health insurance (Business Desk, 2012). Private health insurance in New Zealand covers the user for any number of health services including a choice of health care provider, while also having the perception of cutting down waiting time for elective surgeries (Health Fund, 2010; enz.org, n.d).  The insured user pays a premium for their medical insurance cover whereas the public health user  pays no money for most health services and can access all services provided by the DHB (Health Fund, 2010).  Private health insurance users are nevertheless able to access all publicly funded health services. 

Health Fund Association (2010) inform us that having a health system that is funded by both public and private sectors is beneficial in a country as small as New Zealand, as it means people have choices about which health services they use. However, Dare (2012) argues that the public  - private partnership is not evenly balanced and furthermore, the private insurance system is working against the public health system to the private providers benefit.  

Subsequently, I feel after researching the health system to help inform this blog, the question of the health system being paid for by the tax payers or individuals is a lot more complicated than I first thought.  The public and private health sectors work together for the greater good of the overall health system.  The private health care system is for those that can afford it, however if you need emergency medical attention in New Zealand you will get the highest care the provider can deliver, whether  you have private medical insurance or not.  Therefore, the answer to the question is a little bit of both, people who can afford it ought to have private insurance, because they are in a position to take care of themselves subsequently lessening the load on the public system. Those that cannot afford private health insurance should not worry about accessing adequate health care, because the New Zealand government delivers a health system that will provide for you.    

References:

An Encyclopaedia of New Zealand (1966)  Public health.  Te Ara: The encyclopaedia of New
Bramhall, S. (2003). The New Zealand health care system. Physicians for a National Health
            Program. Retrieved from
New Zealand private health insurance uptake hits a 6 year low. (2012, May 23).   NZ Hearld.
            Retrieved from  
Dare, T. (2012). Private versus public health insurance.  Retrieved from
Enz.org.nz (2012). Healthcare for migrants to New Zealand – 12 must knows.  Retrieved
Health Funds Association of New Zealand (2010). Fact file: Health insurance in New
            Zealand.  Retrieved from
New Zealand Government. (n.d). Ministry of Health. Retrieved from
            http://www.health.govt.nz/.
Pollock, K (2012). Public health: What is public health?. Te Ara: The encyclopaedia of New
            Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/public-health.
Plunket (n.d). Our history. Retrieved from
Southern Cross Healthcare Group (n.d). Southern cross’ early years. Retrieved from
Wikipedia (n.d). Ministry of Health (New Zealand). Retrieved from





Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Accessibility to the Public Health System

My social issue blog is about the accessibility of the public health system to our most vulnerable, our children and lower income families. 

Why access to public health for children? I believe if our children are unwell they are unable to fully experience an environment where they can explore, contribute, communicate, feel a sense of belonging and well-being (Ministry of Education, 1996). Teachers must advocate for the children we work with and give them a voice, when they otherwise would not have one. In particular, in a public forum when discussing social issues that are important for our children, such as whether or not children have adequate access to the public health system.

I will be exploring whether or not children and low income families are accessing the services the government has put in place to target them, for example, Primary Health Care.

The Ministry of Health (2013) states “all New Zealand citizens are eligible for publicly funded services”. But is this statement really true and are all New Zealanders accessing the public health system?

New Zealand's public health system seems to be moving towards a user pays health system. Due to a shift of government from the left to the right in New Zealand, there has been a shift in ideology that our public health system should be a system where the consumer pays. Giddens (1997, cited in Adams, 2005) points out that “we live in a social order where economic growth tends to take precedents over all else – but this situation creates a lack of meaning in everyday life” (p. 30). The priority of economics versus the importance of people is beginning to be seen in health policies that have come into effect since National was elected into government in 2008.

I therefore pose two questions, should the public being paying for a health system or should the individual pay as he goes? How does this affect the health of the children of lower income families?

I need to acknowledge that there are other groups that are disadvantaged when gaining access to public health systems, the elderly and Maori and Pacific populations.  However I do not have the word count or scope in this blog to explore these issues.


References:

Adams, P. (2005).Competing visions of society. In P. Adams, R. Openshaw, & J. Hamer, (Eds). 
Education and society in Aotearoa New Zealand (2nd ed.). (pp.4-32). North Shore, New Zealand: Cengage Learning. 

Ministry of Education (1996). Te Whaariki: He Whaariki matauranga mo nga mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.